Ship with confidence. Our QA engineers cover manual testing, automation, performance and security end to end — either as your whole QA function or alongside the testers you already have.
Most teams have some of this covered and a gap somewhere. We are happy to fill the gap rather than insist on taking over everything.
Functional, regression, usability and cross-browser testing on real devices. Exploratory sessions to find the things a written test case never would, with defects logged in your tracker, reproducible.
UI automation with Selenium, Cypress or Playwright, API testing, and mobile automation with Appium. Built into your CI so it runs on every commit rather than sitting in someone's local folder.
Find where the system bends before your users do. Load, stress and soak testing with JMeter or k6, with results tied to the change that caused them.
OWASP Top 10 checks, dependency and vulnerability scanning, authentication and authorisation testing, and retesting after fixes.
Testing early in the sprint, not as a rushed phase before release, is what actually reduces escaped defects.
Once the regression suite is automated, a full pass costs minutes of machine time instead of days of a person's week — so it runs every time, not just before big releases.
Coverage, pass rate, defect trends and flaky tests reported every sprint. Quality becomes a number you can argue about rather than a feeling.
Jira, TestRail, Azure DevOps, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI. We work in your tools; we do not make you adopt ours.
We look at your product, your current testing and your release process, and tell you where the risk actually is.
What gets automated, what stays manual, what gets tested at all. Agreed with you before we start writing tests.
Framework, environments and test data, then coverage of the critical paths first.
Tests run on every commit and every release candidate, with results visible to your whole team.
Coverage, defects and flaky tests reviewed each sprint; the suite is maintained, not abandoned.
Yes, and that is the most common arrangement. Often we bring the automation skills while your team keeps the domain knowledge — that combination works better than replacing anyone.
It depends on how often you release. If you ship monthly, manual regression may be fine. If you ship weekly or more, manual regression quietly becomes the bottleneck and automation pays for itself.
That is normal. We start with the handful of user journeys that would hurt most if they broke, automate those, and grow coverage from there. Trying to automate everything at once fails.
Yes — iOS and Android, on real devices as well as simulators, including the older OS versions your analytics say your users are actually on.
A fixed-scope assessment can usually start within a week or two. A standing QA team takes a little longer, depending on the skills involved.
A first conversation is free and there is no commitment. Tell us what you are trying to do and we will tell you honestly whether we are the right people for it.
Contact usHow we protect your code, data and systems — NDAs, IP ownership and access control.
Security & ComplianceStart with an assessment of where the real risk is in your release process. It is short, it is costed up front, and it stands on its own.
